4.4 Article

Numerical and Experimental Validation of Electromagnetic Time Reversal for Geolocation of Lightning Strikes

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY
Volume 62, Issue 5, Pages 2156-2163

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEMC.2019.2957531

Keywords

Lightning; Sensors; Entropy; Position measurement; Electromagnetics; Discharges (electric); Fault diagnosis; Entropy; experimental validation; electromag-netic time reversal; finite difference time domain (FDTD); lightning return stroke; unchanged and simplified media

Funding

  1. Swiss Federal Office of Energy [SI/501706-01]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [200020_175594]
  3. European Union [737033-LLR]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We implement an electromagnetic time reversal technique (EMTR) to locate lightning return strokes. The two-dimensional finite difference time domain is employed to simulate the EMTR process in both, the forward-time and the backward-time phases. Scatterers are included in the computational domain to emulate the presence of objects. Three possible criteria to find the optimum time slice of the EMTR process that includes the maximum peak field, maximum peak energy, and last local minimum of entropy are tested and it is found that only the entropy criterion can successfully locate the lightning discharge. Our analysis shows that the EMTR process in both, using an unchanged and a simplified medium for the backward time works reasonably well even with only two sensors. Furthermore, we validated the proposed method via experimental results using waveforms recorded at two sensors at distances of 14.7 and 380 km from the Santis Tower. The results demonstrate that the EMTR back-propagation process leads to a refocusing of the radiated energy at the location of the Santis Tower. The ambiguity in the obtained location when only two sensors are used can be resolved either by using an additional sensor or through a more accurate modeling of the terrain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available