4.5 Article

Community-Level Factors Associated With Racial And Ethnic Disparities In COVID-19 Rates In Massachusetts

Journal

HEALTH AFFAIRS
Volume 39, Issue 11, Pages 1984-1992

Publisher

PROJECT HOPE
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01040

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Policies for Action
  2. Commonwealth Fund
  3. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  4. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01HL136708, K23HL148525-1]
  5. Abbott Vascular
  6. AstraZeneca
  7. Boston Scientific
  8. Medtronic
  9. National Institutes of Health [R01MD014970]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Massachusetts has one of the highest cumulative incidence rates of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases in the US. Understanding which specific demographic, economic, and occupational factors have contributed to disparities in COVID-19 incidence rates across the state is critical to informing public health strategies. We performed a cross-sectional study of 351 Massachusetts cities and towns from January 1 to May 6, 2020, and found that a 10-percentage-point increase in the Black non-Latino population was associated with an increase of 312.3 COVID-19 cases per 100,000 population, whereas a 10-percentage-point increase in the Latino population was associated with an increase of 258.2 cases per 100,000. Independent predictors of higher COVID-19 rates included the proportion of foreign-born noncitizens living in a community, mean household size, and share of food service workers. After adjustment for these variables, the association between the Latino population and COVID-19 rates was attenuated. In contrast, the association between the Black population and COVID-19 rates persisted but may be explained by other systemic inequities. Public health and policy efforts that improve care for foreign-born noncitizens, address crowded housing, and protect food service workers may help mitigate the spread of COVID-19 among minority communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available