4.6 Review

Spotlight on the role of human papillomavirus vaccines

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 160, Issue 1, Pages 346-350

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.034

Keywords

HPV; Cervical Cancer; Vaccine; Dysplasia; Conization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Massive implementation of screening programs in high income settings has significantly reduced the incidence of cervical cancer, but it remains a major health concern. HPV vaccination has proven to be cost-effective in reducing HPV-related lesions and cervical cancer, particularly in adolescents and young adults. However, further research is needed to assess the cost-effectiveness of vaccination in specific groups such as post-treatment individuals, older adults, HIV-positive patients, and women receiving solid organs transplantation.
In high income setting, the massive implementation of screening programs has reduced the incidence of cervical cancer, dramatically. However, cervical cancer still remains a major health concern, being one of the most common cause of death for cancer among women. The adoption of primary prevention through vaccination against HPV aims to reduce the prevalence of HPV-related lesions and cervical cancer. Accumulating data highlighted the cost-effectiveness of introducing HPV vaccination for adolescent and young adults. In the present review, we critically evaluated the role of vaccination against HPV, focusing much more on the role of vaccination in specific cluster of subjects (eg, post-treatment and older adults). Additionally, we evaluated the available evidence on the role of vaccination in HIV-positive subjects and in women receiving solid organs transplantation. We observed that although vaccination might be considered effective in those cluster of subjects; further evidence is needed to assess the cost-effectiveness of vaccination in these settings. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All tights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available