4.8 Article

Beyond ecosystem modeling: A roadmap to community cyberinfrastructure for ecological data-model integration

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 13-26

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15409

Keywords

accessibility; benchmarking; community cyberinfrastructure; data; data assimilation; ecosystem models; interoperability; reproducibility

Funding

  1. NSF [1062547, 1458021, 1457897, 1062204, 1261582]
  2. NASA Terrestrial Ecosystems
  3. Energy Biosciences Institute
  4. Amazon AWS education grant
  5. Strategic Research Council at the Academy of Finland [327214]
  6. Academy of Finland [297350]
  7. Business Finland [6905/31/2018]
  8. UK NERC National Centre for Earth Observation
  9. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  10. NASA CMS [80NSSC17K0711]
  11. DOE Reducing Uncertainties in Biogeochemical Interactions through Synthesis and Computation Science Focus Area (RUBISCO SFA) - Earth & Environmental Systems Modeling (EESM) Program in the Climate and Environmental Sciences Division (CESD)
  12. Next-Generation Ecosystem Experiments (NGEE-Arctic and NGEE-Tropics)
  13. Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the Department of Energy, Office of Science
  14. United States Department of Energy [DE-SC0012704]
  15. Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes [CE170100023]
  16. ARC [DP190101823]
  17. NSW Research Attraction and Acceleration Program
  18. Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program of Oak Ridge National Laboratory [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  19. Reducing Uncertainties in Biogeochemical Interactions through Synthesis and Computation Science Focus Area (RUBISCO SFA) in the Earth & Environmental Systems Modeling (EESM) Program
  20. Next-Generation Ecosystem Experiments (NGEE-Arctic and NGEE-Tropics) Projects in the Terrestrial Ecosystem Science (TES) Program
  21. NASA program: CARBON
  22. NASA program: CMS
  23. Direct For Biological Sciences
  24. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1457897, 1062547] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  25. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  26. Direct For Biological Sciences [1062204] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  27. Academy of Finland (AKA) [297350, 327214, 297350] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In an era of rapid global change, the ability to understand and predict Earth's natural systems lags behind monitoring changes in the biosphere. Improving the information infrastructure through community-driven approaches is crucial to meeting the pressing needs of science and society in the 21st century. This roadmap focuses on key opportunities for community tools to bridge the gap between empirical research and modeling and accelerate the pace of discovery.
In an era of rapid global change, our ability to understand and predict Earth's natural systems is lagging behind our ability to monitor and measure changes in the biosphere. Bottlenecks to informing models with observations have reduced our capacity to fully exploit the growing volume and variety of available data. Here, we take a critical look at the information infrastructure that connects ecosystem modeling and measurement efforts, and propose a roadmap to community cyberinfrastructure development that can reduce the divisions between empirical research and modeling and accelerate the pace of discovery. A new era of data-model integration requires investment in accessible, scalable, and transparent tools that integrate the expertise of the whole community, including both modelers and empiricists. This roadmap focuses on five key opportunities for community tools: the underlying foundations of community cyberinfrastructure; data ingest; calibration of models to data; model-data benchmarking; and data assimilation and ecological forecasting. This community-driven approach is a key to meeting the pressing needs of science and society in the 21st century.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available