Journal
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
Volume 223, Issue 3, Pages 1644-1657Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggaa398
Keywords
Antarctica; Joint inversion; Crustal structure
Categories
Funding
- Natural Environment Research Council [NE/L006065/1]
- National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs [0632230, 0632239, 0652322, 0632335, 0632136, 0632209, 0632185]
- SEIS-UK
- Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS) through the PASSCAL Instrument Center
- NSF [EAR1063471]
- NSF Office of Polar Programs
- DOE National Nuclear Security Administration
- NERC [bas0100029, NE/L006294/1, NE/L006065/1, bas0100034] Funding Source: UKRI
- Directorate For Geosciences
- Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [0632185, 0632335] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
- Directorate For Geosciences
- Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [0632209, 0632136] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
We determine crustal shear wave velocity structure and crustal thickness at recently deployed seismic stations across West Antarctica, using a joint inversion of receiver functions and fundamental mode Rayleigh wave phase velocity dispersion. The stations are from both the UK Antarctic Network (UKANET) and Polar Earth Observing Network/Antarctic Network (POLENET/ANET). The former include, for the first time, four stations along the spine of the Antarctic Peninsula, three in the Ellsworth Land and five stations in the vicinity of the Pine Island Rift. Within the West Antarctic Rift System (WARS) we model a crustal thickness range of 18-28 km, and show that the thinnest crust (similar to 18 km) is in the vicinity of the Byrd Subglacial Basin and Bentley Subglacial Trench. In these regions we also find the highest ratio of fast (V-s = 4.0-4.3 km s(-1), likely mafic) lower crust to felsic/intermediate upper crust. The thickest mafic lower crust we model is in Ellsworth Land, a critical area for constraining the eastern limits of the WARS. Although we find thinner crust in this region (similar to 30 km) than in the neighbouring Antarctic Peninsula and Haag-Ellsworth Whitmore block (HEW), the Ellsworth Land crust has not undergone as much extension as the central WARS. This suggests that the WARS does not link with the Weddell Sea Rift System through Ellsworth Land, and instead has progressed during its formation towards the Bellingshausen and Amundsen Sea Embayments. We also find that the thin WARS crust extends towards the Pine Island Rift, suggesting that the boundary between the WARS and the Thurston Island block lies in this region, similar to 200 km north of its previously accepted position. The thickest crust (38-40 km) we model in this study is in the Ellsworth Mountain section of the HEW block. We find thinner crust (30-33 km) in the Whitmore Mountains and Haag Nunatak sectors of the HEW, consistent with the composite nature of the block. In the Antarctic Peninsula we find a crustal thickness range of 30-38 km and a likely dominantly felsic/intermediate crustal composition. By forward modelling high frequency receiver functions we also assess if any thick, low velocity subglacial sediment accumulations are present, and find a 0.1-0.8-km-thick layer at 10 stations within the WARS, Thurston Island and Ellsworth Land. We suggest that these units of subglacial sediment could provide a source region for the soft basal till layers found beneath numerous outlet glaciers, and may act to accelerate ice flow.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available