4.5 Review

The Evolution of Chromosome Numbers: Mechanistic Models and Experimental Approaches

Journal

GENOME BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evaa220

Keywords

chromosome numbers; polyploidy; dysploidy; cytogenomics; phylogenetic models; genome evolution

Funding

  1. CEITEC 2020 Project [LQ1601]
  2. Israel Science Foundation [961/17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chromosome numbers are a fundamental genomic attribute, providing strong phylogenetic signals, but vary widely among eukaryotes. Changes in chromosome numbers, often indicating major genomic events, can be inferred through mechanistic processes, experimental procedures, and computational methodologies. These tools allow for valuable predictions about historical events that have influenced chromosome numbers and genome structures.
Chromosome numbers have been widely used to describe the most fundamental genomic attribute of an organism or a lineage. Although providing strong phylogenetic signal, chromosome numbers vary remarkably among eukaryotes at all levels of taxonomic resolution. Changes in chromosome numbers regularly serve as indication of major genomic events, most notably polyploidy and dysploidy. Here, we review recent advancements in our ability to make inferences regarding historical events that led to alterations in the number of chromosomes of a lineage. We first describe the mechanistic processes underlying changes in chromosome numbers, focusing on structural chromosomal rearrangements. Then, we focus on experimental procedures, encompassing comparative cytogenomics and genomics approaches, and on computational methodologies that are based on explicit models of chromosome-number evolution. Together, these tools offer valuable predictions regarding historical events that have changed chromosome numbers and genome structures, as well as their phylogenetic and temporal placements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available