4.2 Article

SH3P2 suppresses osteoclast differentiation through restricting membrane localization of myosin 1E

Journal

GENES TO CELLS
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages 707-717

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gtc.12806

Keywords

bone resorption; M-CSF; myosin type I; osteoclast; RANKL

Funding

  1. Naito Foundation
  2. Mitsubishi Foundation
  3. NOVARTIS Foundation (Japan) for the Promotion of Science
  4. Kanahara Ichiro Memorial Foundation
  5. Takeda Science Foundation
  6. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [16K08238, 25460067, JP20K07032]
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K08238, 25460067] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Osteoclasts are multinucleated cells responsible for bone resorption. Src homology 3 (SH3) domain-containing protein-2 (SH3P2)/osteoclast-stimulating factor-1 regulates osteoclast differentiation, but its exact role remains elusive. Here, we show that SH3P2 suppresses osteoclast differentiation. SH3P2 knockout (KO) mice displayed decreased femoral trabecular bone mass and enhanced localization of osteoclasts on the tibial trabecular bone surface, suggesting that SH3P2 suppresses bone resorption by osteoclasts. Osteoclast differentiation based on cellular multinuclearity induced by macrophage colony-stimulating factor and receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) was enhanced in bone marrow-derived macrophages lacking SH3P2. RANKL induced SH3P2 dephosphorylation, which increased the association of actin-dependent motor protein myosin 1E (Myo1E) with SH3P2 and thereby prevented Myo1E localization to the plasma membrane. Consistent with this, Myo1E in the membrane fraction increased in SH3P2-KO cells. Together with the attenuated osteoclast differentiation in Myo1E knocked down cells, SH3P2 may suppress osteoclast differentiation by preventing their cell-to-cell fusion depending on Myo1E membrane localization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available