4.7 Article

An effective discrete artificial bee colony algorithm with idle time reduction techniques for two-sided assembly line balancing problem of type-II

Journal

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
Volume 97, Issue -, Pages 146-156

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2016.05.004

Keywords

Assembly line balancing; Two-sided assembly line; Artificial bee algorithm; Idle time reduction

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [51275366, 51305311]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two-sided assembly line is broadly utilized to manufacture high-volume large-size products. Reconfiguration of this line is a major practice in industry, which is known as two-sided assembly line balancing problem of type-II. To solve this NP-hard problem, this paper proposes an improved discrete artificial bee colony (DABC) algorithm via blending idle time reduction techniques. The cycle time compression mechanism speeds up the search process by reducing total idle times to a larger extent on earlier iterations. Task assignment rule is specifically designed to eliminate sequence-dependent idle times. The overload and underload are taken into account as a secondary objective to reduce the remaining idle times. To achieve a fine balance between the diversification and intensification, the employed bees in the DABC algorithm generate new food sources by combining the features of two solutions, and the onlookers expand the search space with the variable neighborhood search. Nine recent meta-heuristics including a simulated annealing algorithm and an ant colony optimization algorithm are also extended for the TALBP-II to test the performance of the proposed DABC algorithm. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms the nine compared algorithms and find 22 brand-new results for large-size problems. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available