4.7 Article

An integrating OWA-TOPSIS framework in intuitionistic fuzzy settings for multiple attribute decision making

Journal

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
Volume 98, Issue -, Pages 185-194

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2016.05.029

Keywords

Intuitionistic fuzzy numbers; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Information loss; Multiple attribute group decision making

Funding

  1. Shanxi Scholarship Council of China [2015-032]
  2. Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi
  3. Program for the Philosophy and Social Sciences Research of Higher Learning Institutions of Shanxi
  4. Youth Foundation of Taiyuan University of Technology [2014QN041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we develop an integrating OWA-TOPSIS approach in intuitionistic fuzzy environment to tackle fuzzy multiple attribute decision making problems. The proposed intuitionistic fuzzy OWA-TOPSIS method provides a general framework of diverse fuzzy information aggregation process including different determination methods of extreme points. There are six different types of information aggregation (s-p-d type, p-s-d type, s-d-p type, p-d-s type, d-s-p type and d-p-s type) following the different sequences of source aggregation, preference aggregation. During the different aggregation scenarios, positive ideal points and negative ideal points are identified as a point, a vector or a matrix. A real application example is provided to demonstrate in detail the proposed approach. The comparative results in total 32 experiments show the rankings consistency and different levels of information loss in the six different aggregation types. On the whole, the ranks are most precise in d-s-p and d-p-s types, and more precise in s-p-d and p-s-d types than that in s-d-p and p-d-s types. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available