4.6 Article

AN EFFICIENT MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATOR FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL FRACTIONAL BROWNIAN MOTION

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0218348X21500250

Keywords

Two-Dimensional Fractional Brownian Motion; Hurst Exponent; Fractal Dimension; Pattern Recognition; Maximum Likelihood Estimator

Funding

  1. Chung Shan Medical University [CSMU-INT-105-05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces the importance of the Hurst exponent in pattern recognition and proposes iterative maximum likelihood estimator and efficient MLE algorithms for estimating the Hurst exponent in 2D FBM. Experimental results show the effectiveness and accuracy of these algorithms at different image sizes.
For pattern recognition, natural scenes and medical images are often modeled as two-dimensional fractional Brownian motion (2D FBM), which can be easily described by the Hurst exponent (H), a real number between 0 and 1. The Hurst exponent is directly related to the fractal dimension (D) by D = 3-H, and hence it very suitably serves as a characteristic index. Therefore, how to estimate the Hurst exponent effectively and efficiently is very important in pattern recognition. In this paper, a partially iterative algorithm, simply called an iterative maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) for 2D DFBM is first proposed and then a more sufficiently iterative algorithm, simply called an efficient MLE for 2D DFBM, is further proposed via a perfect structure of the log-likelihood function related to the Hurst exponent. Except for theoretical knowledge, two practical algorithms are also correspondingly provided for easy applications. Experimental results show that the MLE for 2D DFBM is effective and workable; its accuracy gets higher as the image size increases, and hence its recognition resolution is much finer to identify small difference among patterns. Furthermore, the efficient MLE is much quicker than the iterative MLE, especially at larger image sizes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available