4.7 Article

Purification and identification of novel antioxidant peptides from watermelon seed protein hydrolysates and their cytoprotective effects on H2O2-induced oxidative stress

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 327, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127059

Keywords

Watermelon seed peptides; Antioxidant activity; Structure-activity relationship; In silico analysis; Cytoprotective effect

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program, China [2016YFD0400303]
  2. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province, China [KYCX17_1799]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to purify and identify antioxidant peptides from watermelon seed protein hydrolysates (WSPHs-I: Mw < 1 kDa) and further evaluate their cytoprotective effects against H2O2-induced oxidative stress in HepG2 cells. After purification by Sephadex G-15 and semi-preparative reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), five peptides, RDPEER (P1), KELEEK (P2), DAAGRLQE (P3), LDDDGRL (P4), and GFAGDDAPRA (P5) were sequenced by LC-MS/MS and synthesized with solid-phase synthesis method. These peptides showed desirable 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging capacity (IC50: 0.216 +/- 0.01-0.435 +/- 0.03), 2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) radical scavenging capacity (IC50: 0.54 +/- 0.02-1.23 +/- 0.03), and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) (82.36 +/- 1.2-130.67 +/- 2.2 mu M TE/mg). Among them, peptide P1 exhibited the strongest antioxidant capacity. Moreover, the results suggested that peptide P1 may protect HepG2 cells from H2O2-induced oxidative damage by significantly inhibiting reactive oxygen species (ROS), [Ca2+]i, malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and increasing antioxidative enzyme activities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available