4.5 Editorial Material

Are open-source approaches the most efficient way forward for COVID-19 drug discovery?

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 115-117

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17460441.2020.1820983

Keywords

COVID-19; coronavirus; antiviral; treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Different approaches, such as open collaboration and closed market-driven methods, can be used for drug discovery against the COVID-19 virus. In the rapidly evolving nature of this virus, organizations should collaborate with each other to ensure timely approval of satisfactory treatment.
Introduction:The COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed the production of potential antivirals and vaccines from research organizations across the globe. The initial step for all drug discovery models is the identification of suitable targets. One approach organizations may take to tackle this involves issuing raw data publicly for collaboration with other organizations in order to spark discussion, collectively experiment and stay up to date with advances in scientific knowledge. Areas covered:Numerous organizations have released genomic data, amongst other tools, for the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and this has led to the development of growing datasets of knowledge for continued collaboration amongst different scientific communities. A different technique employs a more closed, market-driven method in order to stay ahead financially in the race for developing a suitable antiviral or vaccine. The latter allows sustained motivation for company ambitions and progress has been made toward clinical trials for potential drugs. Expert opinion:A case can be made for both open and closed drug discovery models; however, due to the rapidly evolving nature of this deadly virus, organizations should collate their research and support one another to ensure satisfactory treatment can be approved in a timely manner.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available