4.3 Article

Experimental and numerical analysis of curved turbulators in different arrangements through a rectangular channel

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL HEAT TRANSFER
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 22-44

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08916152.2020.1817177

Keywords

Rectangular channel; curved turbulators; different arrangements; experimental and numerical

Funding

  1. Islamic Azad University of Shahrood Branch
  2. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the effects of shape and arrangement of turbulators on streamlines and contours of airflow were analyzed using experimental and numerical results. The C turbulators in the FV arrangement showed the best performance.
Turbulators have been developed as a capable passive technique for enhancing heat transfer through channels. The shape and arrangement of these geometries are the main factors in their performance. In the current analysis, three curved turbulators, i.e. circular (C), rectangular (R), and diamond (D), with four various arrangements, i.e. forward-vertical (FV), forward-horizontal (FH), backward-vertical (BV), and backward-horizontal (BH), inside a rectangular channel at the constant heat flux are examined. The thermal and aerodynamic characteristics are analyzed using the dimensional parameters ofhand increment pas well as the dimensionless parameters ofNu(enh)/Nu(smo)vs.f(enh)/f(smo). Based on experimental data and their corresponding numerical results, the effects of both shape and arrangement on streamlines and contours of airflow are discussed. Also, a performance index (eta) is applied to apprise overall thermal-aerodynamic performance at inlet velocities of 1, 2, and 3 m/s. The results show that the value of eta has a deceasing trend with the inlet velocity, indicating a better performance is found at lower velocity for these turbulators. The best performance could be achieved by the C turbulators at the FV arrangement (CFV model with eta between 1.36 and 1.52), followed the DFH model with eta between 1.35 and 1.49.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available