4.6 Article

Within-patient phylogenetic reconstruction reveals early events in Barrett's Esophagus

Journal

EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 399-415

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eva.13125

Keywords

ARID1A; Barrett's Esophagus; CDKN2A; esophageal adenocarcinoma; genome doubling; phylogeny; SMARCA4; subclonality; TP53

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [CA015704, CA140657, CA91955]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Barrett's Esophagus is a neoplastic condition that can progress to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Early steps in the formation of the Barrett's segment strongly influence whether patients will develop cancer in the future.
Barrett's Esophagus is a neoplastic condition which progresses to esophageal adenocarcinoma in 5% of cases. Key events affecting the outcome likely occur before diagnosis of Barrett's and cannot be directly observed; we use phylogenetic analysis to infer such past events. We performed whole-genome sequencing on 4-6 samples from 40 cancer outcome and 40 noncancer outcome patients with Barrett's Esophagus, and inferred within-patient phylogenies of deconvoluted clonal lineages. Spatially proximate lineages clustered in the phylogenies, but temporally proximate ones did not. Lineages with inferred loss-of-function mutations in both copies ofTP53andCDKN2Ashowed enhanced spatial spread, whereas lineages with loss-of-function mutations in other frequently mutated loci did not. We propose a two-phase model with expansions ofTP53andCKDN2Amutant lineages during initial growth of the segment, followed by relative stasis. Subsequent to initial expansion, mutations in these loci as well asARID1AandSMARCA4may show a local selective advantage but do not expand far: The spatial structure of the Barrett's segment remains stable during surveillance even in patients who go on to cancer. We conclude that the cancer/noncancer outcome is strongly affected by early steps in formation of the Barrett's segment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available