4.7 Article

Comparing RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST in advanced melanoma patients treated with pembrolizumab in a phase II clinical trial

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 1853-1862

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07249-y

Keywords

RECIST; Melanoma; Immunotherapy

Funding

  1. Foundation for the National Institute of Health (FNIH) Biomarkers Consortium, Advanced Metrics and Modeling
  2. Volumetric CT for Precision Analysis of Clinical Trial Results (Vol-PACT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared tumor response assessment using RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST in melanoma patients treated with pembrolizumab. It found that iRECIST was more appropriate in detecting pseudoprogression, leading to longer overall survival for patients with pseudoprogression compared to those with uncontrolled disease.
Objectives To compare tumor best overall response (BOR) by RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST, to explore the incidence of pseudoprogression in melanoma treated with pembrolizumab, and to assess the impact of pseudoprogression on overall survival (OS). Methods A total of 221 patients with locally advanced/unresectable melanoma who received pembrolizumab as part of KEYNOTE-002 trial were included in this study. Radiological assessment of imaging was centrally reviewed to assess tumor response. Incidence of discordance in BOR between RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST as well as rate of pseudoprogression were measured. OS of patients with pseudoprogression was compared with that of those with uncontrolled disease. Results Of the 221 patients in this cohort, 136 patients developed PD as per RECIST v1.1 and 78 patients with PD continued treatment and imaging beyond initial RECIST 1.1-defined PD. Among the 78 patients who continued therapy and imaging post-progression, RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST were discordant in 10 patients (12.8%) and pseudoprogression was encountered in 14 patients (17.9%). OS of patients with pseudoprogression was longer than that of patients with uncontrolled disease/true progression (29.9 months versus 8.0 months,pvalue < 0.001). Conclusions Effectiveness of immunotherapy in clinical trials depends on the criterion used to assess tumor response (RECIST 1.1 vs iRECIST) with iRECIST being more appropriate to detect pseudoprogression and potentially prevent premature termination of effective therapy. Pseudoprogression was associated with improved OS in comparison with that of patients with uncontrolled disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available