4.7 Article

Prediction of breast cancer molecular subtypes on DCE-MRI using convolutional neural network with transfer learning between two centers

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 2559-2567

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07274-x

Keywords

Breast neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Machine learning; Receptors; estrogen; Receptor; ErbB-2

Funding

  1. NIH/NCI [R01 CA127927, R21 CA208938]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to differentiate three breast cancer molecular subtypes on MRI using deep learning algorithms, with the recurrent CNN achieving higher accuracy in the training dataset. Transfer learning was effective in improving classification accuracy, particularly for datasets acquired in different settings.
Objectives To apply deep learning algorithms using a conventional convolutional neural network (CNN) and a recurrent CNN to differentiate three breast cancer molecular subtypes on MRI. Methods A total of 244 patients were analyzed, 99 in training dataset scanned at 1.5 T and 83 in testing-1 and 62 in testing-2 scanned at 3 T. Patients were classified into 3 subtypes based on hormonal receptor (HR) and HER2 receptor: (HR+/HER2-), HER2+, and triple negative (TN). Only images acquired in the DCE sequence were used in the analysis. The smallest bounding box covering tumor ROI was used as the input for deep learning to develop the model in the training dataset, by using a conventional CNN and the convolutional long short-term memory (CLSTM). Then, transfer learning was applied to re-tune the model using testing-1(2) and evaluated in testing-2(1). Results In the training dataset, the mean accuracy evaluated using tenfold cross-validation was higher by using CLSTM (0.91) than by using CNN (0.79). When the developed model was applied to the independent testing datasets, the accuracy was 0.4-0.5. With transfer learning by re-tuning parameters in testing-1, the mean accuracy reached 0.91 by CNN and 0.83 by CLSTM, and improved accuracy in testing-2 from 0.47 to 0.78 by CNN and from 0.39 to 0.74 by CLSTM. Overall, transfer learning could improve the classification accuracy by greater than 30%. Conclusions The recurrent network using CLSTM could track changes in signal intensity during DCE acquisition, and achieved a higher accuracy compared with conventional CNN during training. For datasets acquired using different settings, transfer learning can be applied to re-tune the model and improve accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available