4.7 Article

4D flow MRI for the assessment of renal transplant dysfunction: initial results

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 909-919

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07208-7

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; Renal blood flow; Renal transplantation; Renal veins; Renal artery

Funding

  1. Guerbet, LLC
  2. Society of Abdominal Radiology Morton Bosniak Research Award
  3. NIDDK [1F32DK109591]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that 4D flow parameters had good inter-observer reproducibility, especially in the renal artery (RA). The flow in RA and RV could distinguish between functional and dysfunctional allografts, and were correlated with histopathology.
Objectives (1) Determine inter-observer reproducibility and test-retest repeatability of 4D flow parameters in renal allograft vessels; (2) determine if 4D flow measurements in the renal artery (RA) and renal vein (RV) can distinguish between functional and dysfunctional allografts; (3) correlate haemodynamic parameters with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), perfusion measured with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and histopathology. Methods Twenty-five prospectively recruited renal transplant patients (stable function/chronic renal allograft dysfunction, 12/13) underwent 4D flow MRI at 1.5 T. 4D flow coronal oblique acquisitions were performed in the transplant renal artery (RA) (velocity encoding parameter, VENC = 120 cm/s) and renal vein (RV) (VENC = 45 cm/s). Test-retest repeatability (n = 3) and inter-observer reproducibility (n = 10) were assessed by Cohen's kappa, coefficient of variation (CoV) and Bland-Altman statistics. Haemodynamic parameters were compared between patients and correlated to the estimated glomerular filtration rate, DCE-MRI parameters (n = 10) and histopathology from allograft biopsies (n = 15). Results For inter-observer reproducibility, kappa was > 0.99 and 0.62 and CoV of flow was 12.6% and 7.8% for RA and RV, respectively. For test-retest repeatability, kappa was > 0.99 and 0.5 and CoV of flow was 27.3% and 59.4%, for RA and RV, respectively. RA (p = 0.039) and RV (p = 0.019) flow were both significantly reduced in dysfunctional allografts. Both identified chronic allograft dysfunction with good diagnostic performance (RA: AUC = 0.76,p = 0.036; RV: AUC = 0.8,p = 0.018). RA flow correlated negatively with histopathologic interstitial fibrosis score ci (rho = - 0.6,p = 0.03). Conclusions 4D flow parameters had better repeatability in the RA than in the RV. RA and RV flow can identify chronic renal allograft dysfunction, with RA flow correlating with histopathologic interstitial fibrosis score.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available