4.7 Article

Exploring sizable triple Higgs couplings in the 2HDM

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 80, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8406-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. 'Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigacion(AEI) [FPA2016-78022-P]
  2. EU Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) [FPA2016-78022-P]
  3. grant IFT Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa [SEV-2016-0597]
  4. MEINCOP Spain [FPA2016-78022-P]
  5. Spanish Red Consolider MultiDark [FPA2017-90566-REDC]
  6. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [674896]
  7. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation via a FPU grant [FPU18/06634]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An important task at future colliders is the measurement of the triple Higgs coupling. Depending on its size relative to the Standard Model (SM) value, certain collider options result in a higher experimental accuracy. Within the framework of Two Higgs Doublet Models (2HDM) types I and II we investigate the allowed ranges for all triple Higgs couplings involving at least one light, SM-like Higgs boson. We take into account theoretical constraints (unitarity, stability), experimental constraints from direct Higgs-boson searches, measurements of the SM-like Higgs-boson properties, flavor observables and electroweak precision data. We find that the SM-type triple Higgs coupling w.r.t. its SM value, lambda hhh/lambda SM, can range between similar to -0.5 and similar to 1.5. Depending on which value is realized, the HL-LHC can compete with, or is clearly inferior to the ILC. We find the coupling lambda hhH between similar to -1.5 and similar to 1.5. Triple Higgs couplings involving two heavy Higgs bosons, lambda hHH, lambda hAA and lambda hH+H- can reach values up to O(10), roughly independent of the 2HDM type. This can lead to potentially strongly enhanced production of two Higgs-bosons at the HL-LHC or high-energy e+e- colliders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available