4.5 Article

Reproducibility of CT texture features of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 133, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109371

Keywords

Reproducibility of results; Pancreas; Neuroendocrine neoplasm; CT; Radiomics; Texture analysis

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [20-315-90070]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the reproducibility of textural features of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs), obtained under various CT-scanning conditions. Methods and materials: We included 12 patients with PNENs and 2 contrast enhanced CT (CECT): 1) from our center according to standard CT-protocol; 2) from another institution. Two radiologists independently segmented the entire neoplasm volume using a 3D region of interest by LIFEx application on the arterial phase and then copied it to the other phases. 52 texture features were calculated for each phase. As a criterion for the segmentation consistency, a value of neoplasm volume was compared using the Bland-Altman method. The Kendall concordance coefficient was calculated to assess the texture features reproducibility in three scenarios: 1) different radiologists, same CECT; 2) same radiologist, different CECT; 3) different radiologists, different CECT. Results: For the scenario 1 the neoplasm volumes (except one large PNEN) were found within two standard deviations; this indicates high consistency of the segmentation. For the first scenario, Kendall's coefficient exceeded a threshold of 0.7 for all 52 features for all CT phases. For the second and third scenario, the concordance coefficient exceeded a threshold of 0.7 in 38, 28, 42, 45 and in 36, 25, 36, 44 features for the native, arterial, venous and delayed phases, respectively. Conclusion: The highest reproducibility was found in the first scenario compared to the second and third: 100 % vs. 74 % and 67 %. Reproducible texture features can be reliably used to assess the PNENs structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available