4.7 Article

Pricing service maintenance contracts using predictive analytics

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 290, Issue 2, Pages 530-545

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.022

Keywords

Maintenance; Servitization; Contract pricing; Predictive analytics; Calibration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With manufacturers shifting focus, full-service maintenance contracts are gaining popularity, requiring considerations for the diversity in machine configurations. Pricing strategy should be differentiated based on expected costs and machine characteristics to prevent adverse selection from impacting profitability.
As more manufacturers shift their focus from selling products to end solutions, full-service maintenance contracts gain traction in the business world. These contracts cover all maintenance related costs during a predetermined horizon in exchange for a fixed service fee and relieve customers from uncertain maintenance costs. To guarantee profitability, the service fees should at least cover the expected costs during the contract horizon. As these expected costs may depend on several machine-dependent characteristics, e.g. operational environment, the service fees should also be differentiated based on these characteristics. If not, customers that are less prone to high maintenance costs will not buy into or renege on the contract. The latter can lead to adverse selection and leave the service provider with a maintenance-heavy portfolio, which may be detrimental to the profitability of the service contracts. We contribute to the literature with a data-driven tariff plan based on the calibration of predictive models that take into account the different machine profiles. This conveys to the service provider which machine profiles should be attracted at which price. We demonstrate the advantage of a differentiated tariff plan and show how it better protects against adverse selection. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available