4.7 Article

A multi-scale tensor voting approach for small retinal vessel segmentation in high resolution fundus images

Journal

COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS
Volume 52, Issue -, Pages 28-43

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2016.06.001

Keywords

Diabetic retinopathy; Fundus imaging; Retinal blood vessel segmentation; Multi-scale line detection; Perceptual organization

Funding

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RDCPJ419502-11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Segmenting the retinal vessels from fundus images is a prerequisite for many CAD systems for the automatic detection of diabetic retinopathy lesions. So far, research efforts have concentrated mainly on the accurate localization of the large to medium diameter vessels. However, failure to detect the smallest vessels at the segmentation step can lead to false positive lesion detection counts in a subsequent lesion analysis stage. In this study, a new hybrid method for the segmentation of the smallest vessels is proposed. Line detection and perceptual organization techniques are combined in a multi-scale scheme. Small vessels are reconstructed from the perceptual-based approach via tracking and pixel painting. The segmentation was validated in a high resolution fundus image database including healthy and diabetic subjects using pixel-based as well as perceptual-based measures. The proposed method achieves 85.06% sensitivity rate, while the original multi-scale line detection method achieves 81.06% sensitivity rate for the corresponding images (p < 0.05). The improvement in the sensitivity rate for the database is 6.47% when only the smallest vessels are considered (p < 0.05). For the perceptual-based measure, the proposed method improves the detection of the vasculature by 7.8% against the original multi-scale line detection method (p < 0.05). (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available