4.5 Article

Working memory and emotional interpretation bias in a sample of Syrian refugee adolescents

Journal

EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY
Volume 30, Issue 12, Pages 1885-1894

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-020-01656-8

Keywords

War; Trauma; Adolescents; Refugee; Emotion; Working memory; interpretation bias

Funding

  1. Special Research Fund (Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds, BOF) at Ghent University [01J05415]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined cognitive-affective processing in refugee adolescents from Syria who now lived in Istanbul, Turkey, and found that those with high trauma symptoms performed worse in cognitive control but emotion did not modulate this effect. Additionally, all youths exhibited a bias towards interpreting surprise faces as more negative, with high trauma symptom youth being quicker to allocate them to the positive emotion category.
The number of adolescent refugees around the world has been continuously increasing over the past few years trying to escape war and terror, among other things. Such experience not only increases the risk for mental health problems including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but also may have implications for socio-cognitive development. This study tested cognitive-affective processing in refugee adolescents who had escaped armed conflict in Syria and now resided in Istanbul, Turkey. Adolescents were split into a high trauma (n = 31, 12 girls, mean age = 11.70 years, SD = 1.15 years) and low trauma (n = 27, 14 girls, mean age = 11.07 years, SD = 1.39 years) symptom group using median split, and performed a working memory task with emotional distraction to assess cognitive control and a surprise faces task to assess emotional interpretation bias. The results indicated that high (vs. low) trauma symptom youth were similar to 20% worse correctly remembering the spatial location of a cue, although both groups performed at very low levels. However, this finding was not modulated by emotion. In addition, although all youths also had a similar to 20% bias toward interpreting ambiguous (surprise) faces as more negative, the high (vs. low) symptom youth were faster when allocating such a face to the positive (vs. negative) emotion category. The findings suggest the impact of war-related trauma on cognitive-affective processes essential to healthy development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available