4.1 Article

Tert-butyldimethylsilyl chitosan synthesis and characterization by analytical ultracentrifugation, for archaeological wood conservation

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00249-020-01450-z

Keywords

Analytical ultracentrifuge; NMR; Combined molar mass method

Categories

Funding

  1. Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research
  2. University of Oslo
  3. UK EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Oseberg ship is one of the most important archaeological testimonies of the Vikings. After excavation in 1904, the wooden gravegoods were conserved using alum salts. This resulted in extreme degradation of a number of the objects a hundred years later through acid depolymerisation of cellulose and lignin. The fragile condition of the artefacts requires a reconsolidation which has to be done avoiding water as solvent. We synthesizedtert-butyldimethylsilyl (TBDMS) chitosan which is soluble in a 50:50 solution of ethyl acetate and toluene. Measurement of its molecular weight, to anticipate its penetration, provided a challenge as the density difference of the polymer and solvent was too small to provide adequate solute redistribution under a centrifugal field, so a two-stage process was implemented (i) determination of the weight-average molar mass of the aqueous soluble activated precursor, chitosan mesylate,M(w,mc)using sedimentation equilibrium with the SEDFIT-MSTAR algorithm, and determination of the degree of polymerisationDP; (ii) measurement of the average degree of substitutionDS(TBDMS)of the TBDMS group on each chitosan monosaccharide monomer unit using NMR, to augment theM(w,mc)value to give the molar mass of the TBDMS-chitosan. For the preparation, we findM(w) = 9.8 kg center dot mol(-1), which is within the acceptable limit for penetration and consolidation of degraded wood. Future work will test this on archaeological wood from different sources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available