4.7 Article

Preparation of the Mn/Co mixed oxide catalysts for low-temperature CO oxidation reaction

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 379-388

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10484-x

Keywords

CO oxidation; Cobalt-manganese oxides; Palladium; Low temperature; Catalyst

Funding

  1. Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) [97017638]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mn/Co mixed powders prepared by coprecipitation method showed excellent catalytic performance in low-temperature CO oxidation, with the best performance observed at a Mn/Co molar ratio of 1:1. Incorporation of 1wt.% Pd further enhanced the catalytic activity, with the catalyst exhibiting 100% CO conversion at 80 degrees C.
The Mn/Co mixed powders with various Mn/Co molar ratios were prepared by the coprecipitation method and used in low-temperature CO oxidation. The physicochemical characteristics of these powders were characterized using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET), X-ray diffraction (XRD), temperature-programmed reduction (TPR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses. The results demonstrated that the Mn/Co molar ratio significantly affected both the textural and catalytic properties and the sample with a Mn/Co = 1:1 possessed a BET area of 123.7 m(2)g(-1)with a small mean pore size of 6.44 nm. The catalytic results revealed that the pure cobalt and manganese catalysts possessed the low catalytic activity and the pure Co catalyst is not active at temperatures lower than 140 degrees C. The highest catalytic activity was observed for the catalyst with a Mn/Co = 1. The obtained results showed that the incorporation of Pd into the Mn/Co catalyst significantly enhanced the catalytic activity for oxidation of carbon monoxide and the highest CO conversion was observed for the catalyst with 1 wt.% Pd and this catalyst exhibited a CO conversion of 100% at 80 degrees C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available