4.8 Article

Navigating Multidimensional Social-Ecological System Trade-Offs across Sanitation Alternatives in an Urban Informal Settlement

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 19, Pages 12641-12653

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c03296

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Illinois Distinguished Fellowship at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
  2. Dissertation Completion Fellowship at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
  3. Social and Behavioral Science Research Initiative (SBSRI)
  4. Center for Advanced Study
  5. Campus Research Board
  6. Institute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment (iSEE) at UIUC
  7. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program [DGE-1746047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urban growth in low- and middle-income countries has intensified the need to expand sanitation infrastructure, especially in informal settlements. Sanitation approaches for these settings remain understudied, particularly regarding multidimensional social-ecological outcomes. Guided by a conceptual framework (developed in parallel with this study) re-envisioning sanitation as a human-derived resource system, here we characterize existing and alternative sanitation scenarios in an informal settlement in Kampala, Uganda. Combining two core research approaches (household survey analysis, process modeling), we elucidate factors associated with user satisfaction and evaluate each scenario's resource recovery potential, economic implications, and environmental impacts. We find that existing user satisfaction is associated with factors including cleaning frequency, sharing, and type of toilets, and we demonstrate that alternative sanitation systems may offer multidimensional improvements over existing latrines, drying beds, and lagoons. Transitioning to anaerobic treatment could recover energy while reducing overall net costs by 26-65% and greenhouse gas emissions by 38-59%. Alternatively, replacing pit latrines with container-based facilities greatly improves recovery potential in most cases (e.g., a 2- to 4-fold increase for nitrogen) and reduces emissions by 46-79%, although costs increase. Overall, this work illustrates how our conceptual framework can guide empirical research, offering insight into sanitation for informal settlements and more sustainable resource systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available