4.7 Article

Cytotoxicity and hormonal activity of glyphosate-based herbicides

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 265, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115027

Keywords

Co-formulants; Aliivibrio fischeri; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Estrogenic and androgenic; Dilution percentage

Funding

  1. Thematic Excellence Programme (Szent Istvan University) - Ministry for Innovation and Technology [NKFIH-831-10/2019]
  2. National Research, Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary [NVKP_16-1-2016-0023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) are the most widely used pesticides for weed control. In parallel with the renewal of the active ingredient, polyethoxylated POE(15) containing GBHs were banned in the EU in 2016. Since then, co-formulants were changed and numerous GBHs are marketed with different excipients declared as inert substances. In our study, we focused to determine acute and chronic cytotoxicity (by Aliivibrio fischeri assay) and direct hormonal activity (estrogenic and androgenic effects measured by Saccharomyces cerevisiae BLYES/BLYAS strains, respectively) of glyphosate, AMPA, polyethoxylated POE(15) and 13 GBHs from which 11 formulations do not contain polyethoxylated POE(15). Among the pure substances, neither glyphosate nor AMPA had any effects, while poly-ethoxylated POE(15) exhibited pronounced toxicity and was also estrogenic but not androgenic. Regarding the acute and chronic cytotoxicity and hormonal activity of GBHs, dilution percentages calculated from EC50 values were in the most cases by one or two order of magnitude lower than the minimum recommended dilution for agricultural and household use. Relation could not be observed between the biological effects and type of glyphosate-salts; hence toxicity could be linked to the co-formulants, which are not even declared in 3 GBHs. Toxicological evaluation must focus on these substances and free accessibility of GBHs should be reconsidered. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available