4.6 Article

Xenorhabdus nematophila bacteria shift from mutualistic to virulent Lrp-dependent phenotypes within the receptacles of Steinernema carpocapsae insect-infective stage nematodes

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages 5433-5449

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.15286

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF [IOS - 1353674]
  2. University of Tennessee-Knoxville
  3. UW-Madison Louis and Elsa Thomsen Wisconsin Distinguished Graduate Fellowship
  4. Department of Bacteriology Michael Foster Predoctoral Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Xenorhabdus nematophila bacteria are mutualists of Steinernema carpocapsae nematodes and pathogens of insects. Xenorhabdus nematophila exhibits phenotypic variation between insect virulence (V) and the mutualistic (M) support of nematode reproduction and colonization initiation in the infective juvenile (IJ) stage nematode that carries X. nematophila between insect hosts. The V and M phenotypes occur reciprocally depending on levels of the transcription factor Lrp: high-Lrp expressors are M+V- while low-Lrp expressors are V+M-. We report here that variable (wild type) or fixed high-Lrp expressors also are optimized, relative to low- or no-Lrp expressors, for colonization of additional nematode stages: juvenile, adult and pre-transmission infective juvenile (IJ). In contrast, we found that after the bacterial population had undergone outgrowth in mature IJs, the advantage for colonization shifted to low-Lrp expressors: fixed low-Lrp expressors (M-V+) and wild type (M+V+) exhibited higher average bacterial CFU per IJ than did high-Lrp (M+V-) or no-Lrp (M-V-) strains. Further, the bacterial population becomes increasingly low-Lrp expressing, based on expression of an Lrp-dependent fluorescent reporter, as IJs age. These data support a model that virulent X. nematophila have a selective advantage and accumulate in aging IJs in advance of exposure to insect hosts in which this phenotype is necessary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available