4.1 Review

A Scholarly Review of the Safety and Efficacy of Intranasal Corticosteroids Preparations in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Journal

ENT-EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL
Volume 100, Issue 5, Pages 295-301

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0145561320967727

Keywords

corticosteroids; chronic rhinosinusitis; steroid irrigations; nebulizers; budesonide

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The scholarly review presents an update on the efficacy, safety, and distribution of intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) treatment. Studies show significant improvement in disease-specific and general quality of life measures with all formulations of INCS, indicating the effectiveness and safety of both FDA and non-FDA approved options. Novel distribution devices may further enhance penetration to specific areas within the sinuses.
Objective: The purpose of this scholarly review is to present an update of the efficacy, safety, and distribution of intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) in the context of treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Materials and Methods: A literature review from 1999 to 2020 of MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE databases was performed, using a comprehensive search strategy. Studies reporting on efficacy, safety, and distribution of all INCS formulations, both Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and non-FDA approved, were reviewed. Results and Conclusions: High-level evidence publications and position papers support the role of INCS in medical treatment for CRS. Significant improvement in disease-specific and general quality of life measures is observed with all formulations of INCS. Overall, the use of both FDA and published non-FDA INCS appears to be safe. Several novel distribution devices might improve penetration to specific areas within the sinuses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available