4.7 Article

Seismic behavior of composite shear walls incorporating high-strength materials and CFST boundary elements

Journal

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Volume 220, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110994

Keywords

High-strength steel rebars; Steel fiber reinforced high-strength concrete; Concrete-encased concrete filled steel tube (CFST) columns; Composite shear wall; Seismic performance; Reparability

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Key Project of Beijing Municipal Education Commission [KZ201710005003]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0701104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An innovative shear wall was proposed, which was composed of high-strength concrete and steel rebars, as well as concrete-encased CFST columns embedded at boundary elements. To study the cyclic and resilient behavior of the proposed wall, four walls with shear span ratios of 2.2 were designed and tested under quasi-static cyclic loads. The test parameters were the type of longitudinal bars at boundary elements, the presence of steel fibers, and the axial compression ratio. As test results showed, within the limit of axial compression ratio, the proposed shear walls had small residual deformation until a 2% loading drift ratio; after that, the hysteresis curve became full and the energy dissipation capacity increased, indicating the desirable collapse resistance. Specifically, the use of ultra-high strength longitudinal bars at boundary elements significantly decreased the residual de-formation and improved the reparability. In addition, steel fibers effectively enhanced the deformation capacity of the proposed walls. Finally, given the confined effects of CFST columns and stirrups on concrete, a prediction model for the lateral load-bearing capacity was established. The comparison between predicted and test results from this study and existing research verified the good accuracy of this model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available