4.7 Article

Higher order C(t)-Tz-AT solution for three-dimensional creep crack border fields

Journal

ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
Volume 236, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107203

Keywords

Creep crack border fields; Higher order C(t)-T-z-A(T) solution; Through-thickness cracks; Corner cracks; Surface cracks; Embedded cracks

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFA0705400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51535005]
  3. Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures [MCMS-I-0418K01, MCMS-I-0419K01]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [NZ2020001, NC2018001, NP2019301, NJ2019002]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A higher order C(t)-T-z-A(T) solution is developed for power-law creeping solids on the basis of the C(t)-A(2)(t) and C(t)-T-z solutions. Validations against comprehensive 3D FE analysis results in specimens with through-thickness, corner, surface and embedded cracks show that the developed C(t)-T-z-A(T) solution can provide an accurate description of the 3D crack border stress fields in all the simulated conditions. At small-scale and large-scale creep stages, the absolute value of in-plane constraint coefficient AT is within 0.05 in the SECT, CT and SENB specimens, which indicates that the higher order C(t)-T-z-A(T) solution could degenerate into the C(t)-T-z solution in such high constraint specimens. However, in CCT and part-through cracked specimens, the absolute value of A(T) may increase remarkably with creep time, and the C(t)-T-z-A(T) solution is necessary. Based on the numerical results, a set of explicit empirical formulae of T-z are obtained for all the specimens, and the detailed values of A(T) are listed in Appendix.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available