4.7 Article

Simulation of crack growth in reinforced concrete beams using extended finite element method

Journal

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104698

Keywords

Crack propagation; Fracture mechanics; Extended finite element method; Concrete damage plasticity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fracture mechanics and the crack propagation in reinforced concrete members is one of the most important approaches to structural safety analysis. Thanks to powerful software and increasingly fast computers, numerical simulation is well suited to analyse even more complex problems, such as crack growth, quickly and economically. In order to validate these analyses in their application, however, it is still necessary to confirm and compare numerous models of load-bearing and material behaviour by experimental investigations. This paper presents nonlinear numerical simulations of bending and shear crack propagation in reinforced concrete beams without transverse reinforcement. The smeared and discrete crack growth of haunched and non-haunched beams is analysed. Compared are the load deformation behaviour and curves which show the crack width in relation with the applied load without building a notch in the structure. The obtained results are presented with different mesh densities. The tests and the numerical simulations will provide a broad interpretation of crack growth and redistribution of inner forces in concrete members. As numerical method to map discrete cracks the extended finite element method (XFEM) is applied. For validation, the crack patterns of real experiments are compared with the results of the different finite element models up to two crack initiations. The evaluation is based on single span beams under bending and shear. The numerical simulations make it possible to predict the fracture behaviour of concrete members and shows good agreement with the experimental results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available