4.7 Article

Experimental investigation of exergetic efficiency of 3 side concave dimple roughened absorbers

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 215, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119039

Keywords

Artificial roughness; Reynolds number; Frictional losses; Nusselt no.; Energy efficiency; Effective efficiency; Exergy efficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the exergetic efficiency of a solar air heater duct system with 3 side concave dimple roughness and compared the results with a 1 side roughened system. The experiments under different parameters showed the influence of Reynolds number and temperature parameter on exergetic efficiency.
The present work deals with evaluation of exergetic efficiency (eta(II)) of 3 side concave dimple roughened solar air heater duct system and the results were compared with 1 side roughened system experimentally and theoretically. Exergy analysis uses quality of useful energy i.e., what fraction of solar radiation is actually being converted into useful heat gain of air leaving beside possible losses. Experiments were performed under actual outdoor condition in open sun and relevant input data were recorded for exergy evaluation. Each day's data was recorded under different sets of parameters viz., Reynolds number (Re) 2500-13500, relative roughness pitch (p/e) 8-15, relative roughness height (e/D-h) 0.018-0.045 and dimple's depth to diameter ratio (e/d) 1-2. Variation in exergetic efficiency with Reynolds number and rise in temperature parameter (T-o-T-i)/I at varying p/e, e/Dh and e/d reveals that as Reynolds number changes, both 1 and 3 side roughness shows maximum exergetic efficiency at same Re but 1 side roughened duct shows maximum exergetic efficiency at (T-o-T-i/I) of 0.0172, 0.0125 and 0.017 for different p/e, e/D-h and e/d respectively. For 3 side roughened duct, maximum exergetic efficiency was seen at (T-o-T-i/I) of 0.023, 0.0212 and 0.022 for different p/e, e/Dh and e/d respectively. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available