4.7 Article

Investigating drivers of CO2 emission in China's heavy industry: A quantile regression analysis

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 206, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118159

Keywords

CO2 emissions; The heavy industry; Quantile regression approach

Funding

  1. China National Natural Science Foundation [71974085, 61973145, 71863015]
  2. State Grid Corporation technology project [521104170015]
  3. Ministry of Education of China [10JBG013]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71563014, 71663024]
  5. National Social Science Foundation [18ATJ001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High energy-consuming heavy industry is one of the main sources of China's carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Based on 2005-2017 panel data of China's 30 provinces, this paper uses a quantile regression model to investigate CO2 emissions in the heavy industry. The empirical results show that economic growth exerts a stronger influence on the heavy industry's CO2 emissions in the 25th-50th quantile provinces, due to the difference in the fixed asset investment and heavy industrial output. The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions in the 10th-25th quantile provinces is lower than that in other quantile provinces because these provinces have the least number of college graduates. Energy efficiency has a smaller impact on CO2 emissions in the upper 90th quantile province, owing to the difference in R&D personnel investment and the number of patents granted. Similarly, environmental regulations have minimal impact on CO2 emissions in the upper 90th quantile province, since the growth rate of industrial pollution treatment investment in these provinces is the lowest. However, the impact of energy consumption structure on CO2 emissions in the 10th-25th and 25th-50th quantile provinces is the highest, because of the provincial differences in coal consumption. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available