4.7 Review

Bioremediation of typical chlorinated hydrocarbons by microbial reductive dechlorination and its key players: A review

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
Volume 202, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110925

Keywords

Reductive dechlorination; Biostimulation; Bioaugmentation; Chloroethenes; Polychlorinated biphenyls

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41671468, 41807122, 41301546]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0901200]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20171356, BK20180716]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology [KF 2017-20]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse [PCRRF16018]
  6. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chlorinated hydrocarbon contamination in soils and groundwater has a severe negative impact on the human health. Microbial reductive dechlorination is a major degradation pathway of chlorinated hydrocarbon in anaerobic subsurface environments, has been extensively studied. Recent progress on the diversity of the reductive dechlorinators and the key enzymes of chlororespiration has been well reviewed. Here, we present a thorough overview of the studies related to bioremediation of chloroethenes and polychlorinated biphenyls based on enhanced in situ reductive dechlorination. The major part of this review is to provide an up-to-date summary of functional microorganisms which are either detected during in situ biostimulation or applied in bioaugmentation strategies. The applied biostimulants and corresponding reductive dechlorination products are also summarized and the future research needs are finally discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available