4.7 Article

Causal hypotheses accounting for correlations between decomposition rates of different mass fractions of leaf litter

Journal

ECOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3196

Keywords

cellulose; hemicellulose; lignin; litter decomposition; path analyses; proximate tissue analysis; water soluble

Categories

Funding

  1. NSERC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study measured decomposition rates in different mixtures of tree leaf litters and rejected three alternative causal hypotheses. Instead, a new hypothesis was proposed, suggesting that rapid decomposition of the labile fraction stimulates the decomposition of lignin and hemicellulose, leading to the decomposition of cellulose. This new hypothesis is consistent with known biology and the data and is proposed as the most viable current hypothesis.
Whole-leaf decomposition rates are the sum of the decomposition rates of each chemical fraction (water-soluble, cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin), but the decomposition rates of each fraction show complicated patterns of covariation. What explains these patterns of covariation? After measuring the k values of each fraction in 42 different mixtures of tree leaf litters from five species, we tested three alternative causal hypotheses that have been proposed in the literature concerning these mixture interactions using structura equations modeling. All three hypotheses were rejected by the data. We then proposed a new hypothesis, in which rapid decomposition of the labile (water-soluble) fraction stimulates the decomposition of lignin by white-rot fungi and the decomposition of hemicellulose by brown-rot fungi. A more rapid decomposition of hemicellulose then stimulates the decomposition of cellulose. This hypothesis is both consistent with known biology and with our data and is proposed as the most viable current hypothesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available