4.7 Article

Artificial nightlight alters the predator-prey dynamics of an apex carnivore

Journal

ECOGRAPHY
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 149-161

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.05251

Keywords

ecological disturbance; movement ecology; sensory ecology; sensory pollution; wildlife

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX17AG36G, NNH10ZDA001N]
  2. National Park Service
  3. U.S. Geological Survey
  4. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
  5. Nevada Dept of Wildlife
  6. Arizona Game and Fish Dept
  7. Dept of Energy
  8. Bureau of Land Management
  9. U.S. Forest Service
  10. USDA Wildlife Services
  11. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
  12. USGS
  13. Utah Army National Guard
  14. Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation
  15. African Safari Club of Florida
  16. Utah's Hogle Zoo
  17. Utah Chapter of the American Association of Zoo Keepers
  18. Carson Valley Chukar Club
  19. Shepreth Wildlife Park
  20. Dugway Proving Ground
  21. Grand Canyon Conservancy
  22. Grand Canyon Trust
  23. Johnson Family Foundation
  24. Mule Deer Foundation
  25. Nevada Agricultural Experiment Station
  26. Nevada Bighorns Unlimited
  27. Nevada Division of State Lands
  28. Lake Tahoe License Plate Grant
  29. Northern Nevada Chapter of the Safari Club
  30. Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
  31. Safari Club International
  32. Summerlee Foundation
  33. Sportsman for Fish and Wildlife
  34. Utah Archery Association
  35. Wildlife Conservation Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that deer utilized anthropogenic environments for foraging and were more active at night, while cougars killed deer at the wildland-urban interface and hunted them in darker locations. Light had the greatest effect on where cougars killed deer at the wildland-urban interface.
Artificial nightlight is increasingly recognized as an important environmental disturbance that influences the habitats and fitness of numerous species. However, its effects on wide-ranging vertebrates and their interactions remain unclear. Light pollution has the potential to amplify land-use change, and as such, answering the question of how this sensory stimulant affects behavior and habitat use of species valued for their ecological roles and economic impacts is critical for conservation and land-use planning. Here, we combined satellite-derived estimates of light pollution, with GPS-data from cougarsPuma concolor(n = 56), mule deerOdocoileus hemionus(n = 263) and locations of cougar-killed deer (n = 1562 carcasses), to assess the effects of light exposure on mammal behavior and predator-prey relationships across wildland-urban gradients in the southwestern United States. Our results indicate that deer used the anthropogenic environments to access forage and were more active at night than their wildland conspecifics. Despite higher nightlight levels, cougars killed deer at the wildland-urban interface, but hunted them in the relatively darkest locations. Light had the greatest effect of all covariates on where cougars killed deer at the wildland-urban interface. Both species exhibited functional responses to light pollution at fine scales; individual cougars and deer with less light exposure increasingly avoided illuminated areas when exposed to greater radiance, whereas deer living in the wildland-urban interface selected elevated light levels. We conclude that integrating estimates of light pollution into ecological studies provides crucial insights into how the dynamic human footprint can alter animal behavior and ecosystem function across spatial scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available