4.7 Article

Astronomically forced climate change in the late Cambrian

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 548, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116475

Keywords

cyclostratigraphy; core scanning XRF; Alum Shale; SPICE event; Earth-Moon distance; Furongian

Funding

  1. Carlsberg Foundation [CF16-0876]
  2. Danish Council for Independent Research [DFF - 7014-00295]
  3. Geocenter Denmark Grant [2015-5, 2017-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report evidence for Milankovitch cycles in two drill cores from the Cambro-Ordovician Alum Shale Formation of Scandinavia. The signal is preserved in elemental abundances recorded at high stratigraphic resolution by core scanning XRF analysis (0.2 mm resolution). The new data enable us to establish a floating timeline calibrated to the stable 405 kyr eccentricity cycle for a similar to 8.7 Myr interval across the Miaolingian-Furongian boundary. This interval spans the Steptoean Positive Carbon Isotope Excursion (SPICE), which is recorded in the delta C-13(org) in the studied drill cores. We calculate the durations of the Olenus Superzone to 3.4 +/- 0.2 Myr, the Parabolina Superzone to 1.9 +/- 0.3 Myr, the Leptoplastus Superzone to 0.33 +/- 0.18 Myr, the Protopeltura Superzone to 0.51 +/- 0.20 Myr, and the SPICE event straddling the Paibian and lower main part of the Jiangshanian Stage to 3.0 +/- 0.2 Myr. The sedimentation rate shows similar trends at both drilling locations and is inversely correlated to eustatic sea level changes in certain time intervals, opening tantalizing new prospects of using cyclostratigraphic analyses of shales to track eustatic sea level variations. The identification of obliquity cycles enables us to calculate the Cambrian Earth-Moon distance as well as the day length at similar to 493 Ma to 368.9 +/- 2.3. 10(6) m and 21.78 +/- 0.29 hr, respectively. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available