4.7 Article

Trends in the detection of aquatic non-indigenous species across global marine, estuarine and freshwater ecosystems: A 50-year perspective

Journal

DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages 1780-1797

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13167

Keywords

aquatic non-indigenous species; biological invasions; detection rate; inventory; long-term dataset; population status; richness; spatial patterns; temporal trends; transport pathways

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. NSERC Visiting Fellowship at Fisheries and Oceans Canada
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31622011]
  4. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Aquatic Invasive Species Science Program
  5. CSIRO Centre for Research on Introduced Marine Pests
  6. Ports Australia
  7. COMPLETE project (Completing management options in the Baltic Sea region to reduce risk of invasive species introduction by shipping)
  8. European Union's funding Programme Interreg Baltic Sea Region (European Regional Development Fund)
  9. Fisheries and Oceans Canada
  10. North Pacific Marine Science Organization (PICES)
  11. Biosecurity New Zealand
  12. NZ Government's Strategic Science Investment Fund (SSIF) through NIWA Coasts & Oceans Programme 6
  13. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT) [SFRH/BD/146881/2019]
  14. FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, I.P. [CEECINST/00098/2018]
  15. Allochthonous Species Group of the Italian Society of Marine Biology (S.I.B.M.)
  16. Galapagos Conservancy
  17. Lindblad Expedition/National Geographic Fund
  18. Galapagos Conservation Trust
  19. Paul M. Angell Foundation
  20. Ecoventura
  21. United States Environmental Protection Agency, through its Office of Research and Development
  22. [CONICET-PIP 508]
  23. [ANPCyT-PICT 2016-1083]
  24. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/146881/2019] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim The introduction of aquatic non-indigenous species (ANS) has become a major driver for global changes in species biogeography. We examined spatial patterns and temporal trends of ANS detections since 1965 to inform conservation policy and management. Location Global. Methods We assembled an extensive dataset of first records of detection of ANS (1965-2015) across 49 aquatic ecosystems, including the (a) year of first collection, (b) population status and (c) potential pathway(s) of introduction. Data were analysed at global and regional levels to assess patterns of detection rate, richness and transport pathways. Results An annual mean of 43 (+/- 16SD) primary detections of ANS occurred-one new detection every 8.4 days for 50 years. The global rate of detections was relatively stable during 1965-1995, but increased rapidly after this time, peaking at roughly 66 primary detections per year during 2005-2010 and then declining marginally. Detection rates were variable within and across regions through time. Arthropods, molluscs and fishes were the most frequently reported ANS. Most ANS were likely introduced as stowaways in ships' ballast water or biofouling, although direct evidence is typically absent. Main conclusions This synthesis highlights the magnitude of recent ANS detections, yet almost certainly represents an underestimate as many ANS go unreported due to limited search effort and diminishing taxonomic expertise. Temporal rates of detection are also confounded by reporting lags, likely contributing to the lower detection rate observed in recent years. There is a critical need to implement standardized, repeated methods across regions and taxa to improve the quality of global-scale comparisons and sustain core measures over longer time-scales. It will be fundamental to fill in knowledge gaps given that invasion data representing broad regions of the world's oceans are not yet readily available and to maintain knowledge pipelines for adaptive management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available