4.5 Review

Update on gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Journal

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages 171-182

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.08.031

Keywords

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms; Active surveillance; Endoscopic resection; Surgery

Funding

  1. Gioja Bianca Costanza Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The incidence of GEP-NENs has increased over the past three decades, leading to a variety of treatment options including conservative management, surgical resection, and medical therapies based on disease characteristics.
The incidence gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) has dramatically risen over the last three decades, probably due to the increased detection of asymptomatic lesions. The diagnostic work-up for patients with suspected GEP-NENs is based on conventional imaging, endoscopy, pathology, and functional imaging, including (68)Gallium-DOTATATE PET and F-18-FDG PET. The choice of the best treatment strategy should be based on the evaluation of tumor-related features and patient's characteristics. A conservative management, consisting of active surveillance or endoscopic resection, has been advocated for patients with small, incidentally discovered, nonfunctioning tumors without features of aggressiveness. On the other hand, surgery with lymphadenectomy, also with a minimally invasive approach, represents the gold standard for the curative treatment of localized disease. Moreover, surgical resection plays an important role also in the context of a multimodal treatment strategy for patients with advanced GEP-NENs. Finally, a wide range of medical therapies, comprising somatostatin analogues, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, target therapies and several chemotherapy regimens, can be offered to patients with advanced GEP-NENs not amenable of surgical resection, according to the biological and molecular features of their disease. (C) 2020 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available