4.3 Review

Targeting epigenetics as atherosclerosis treatment: an updated view

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 324-330

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000711

Keywords

apabetalone; bromodomain; cardiovascular disease; histone deacetylate; histone modification

Funding

  1. Netherlands Heart Foundation [CVON 2017-2, 2020T029]
  2. Spark-Holding BV [2015B002, 2019B016]
  3. Fondation Leducq (LEAN-Transatlantic Network Grant)
  4. European Union (EPI-MAC-ITN)
  5. European Union (REPROGRAM
  6. EU Horizon 2020)
  7. ZonMW [09120011910025]
  8. Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review This review discusses the current developments on epigenetic inhibition as treatment for atherosclerosis. Recent findings The first phase III clinical trial targeting epigenetics in cardiovascular disease (CVD), BETonMACE, using the bromodomain inhibitor apabetalone (RVX-208) showed no significant effect on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with type II diabetes, low HDL-c and a recent acute coronary artery event compared with its placebo arm. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that targeting epigenetics in atherosclerosis is a promising novel therapeutic strategy against CVD. Interfering with histone acetylation by targeting histone deacetylates (HDACs) and bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) proteins demonstrated encouraging results in modulating disease progression in model systems. Although the first phase III clinical trial targeting BET in CVD showed no effect on MACE, we suggest that there is sufficient potential for future clinical usage based on the outcomes in specific subgroups and the fact that the study was slightly underpowered. Lastly, we propose that there is future window for targeting repressive histone modifications in atherosclerosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available