4.5 Review

Psychosis in Alzheimer's Disease

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11910-020-01074-y

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Psychosis; Frequency; Impact; Mechanisms; Non-pharmacological; Pharmacological

Funding

  1. Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia
  2. Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)-dementia theme at the King's College London, London, UK
  3. Acadia pharmaceutical company
  4. Lundbeck
  5. Roche
  6. Otsuka
  7. Eli Lilly
  8. Johns Hopkins ADRC [P50AG005146]
  9. Astra-Zeneca
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  11. GE Health
  12. Heptares
  13. Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award
  14. Wolfson Foundation
  15. Royal Society - National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust andKing's College London
  16. Acadia Pharmaceuticals
  17. Addex Therapeutics
  18. Addex Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of Review To review the incidence, treatment and genetics of psychosis in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recent Findings Psychosis in Alzheimer's disease (AD) has an incidence of similar to 10% per year. There is limited evidence regarding psychological interventions. Pharmacological management has focused on atypical antipsychotics, balancing modest benefits with evidence of long-term harms. The 5HT2A inverse agonist pimavanserin appears to confer benefit in PD psychosis with initial evidence of benefit in AD. Cholinesterase inhibitors give modest benefits in DLB psychosis. The utility of muscarinic agonists, lithium, glutamatergic and noradrenergic modulators needs further study. Summary Recent work has confirmed the importance of psychosis in MCI as well as AD. The lack of evidence regarding psychological therapies is an urgent knowledge gap, but there is encouraging evidence for emerging pharmacological treatments. Genetics will provide an opportunity for precision medicine and new treatment targets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available