4.2 Review

A cellular handbook for collided ribosomes: surveillance pathways and collision types

Journal

CURRENT GENETICS
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 19-26

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00294-020-01111-w

Keywords

Ribosome collisions; Disome; Trisome; Ribosome profiling; Surveillance pathway; Programmed ribosome stalling

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the NIH
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [DK075132]
  3. Postdoctoral Research Associate Training Program (PRAT) at the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) [1FI2GM137845]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ribosomes slow down or stall when encountering obstacles on mRNAs, potentially leading to them colliding and forming complexes. Recent studies have shown that such collisions are common on endogenous mRNAs in eukaryotic cells, and the response to them by surveillance pathways depends on the context and duration of ribosome stalling.
Translating ribosomes slow down or completely stall when they encounter obstacles on mRNAs. Such events can lead to ribosomes colliding with each other and forming complexes of two (disome), three (trisome) or more ribosomes. While these events can activate surveillance pathways, it has been unclear if collisions are common on endogenous mRNAs and whether they are usually detected by these cellular pathways. Recent genome-wide surveys of collisions revealed widespread distribution of disomes and trisomes across endogenous mRNAs in eukaryotic cells. Several studies further hinted that the recognition of collisions and response to them by multiple surveillance pathways depend on the context and duration of the ribosome stalling. This review considers recent efforts in the identification of endogenous ribosome collisions and cellular pathways dedicated to sense their severity. We further discuss the potential role of collided ribosomes in modulating co-translational events and contributing to cellular homeostasis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available