4.7 Review

Canola/rapeseed protein - nutritional value, functionality and food application: a review

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
Volume 61, Issue 22, Pages 3836-3856

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1809342

Keywords

Plant protein; protein isolates; napin; cruciferin; rapeseed

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plant-based diet and plant proteins offer potential to meet human nutritional needs and reduce negative environmental impact of food production. Canola/rapeseed proteins have valuable nutritional and functional properties for food applications, although technological challenges need to be addressed.
Plant-based diet and plant proteins specifically are predestined to meet nutritional requirements of growing population of humans and simultaneously reduce negative effects of food production on the environment. While searching for new sources of proteins, special emphasis should be placed on oilseeds of Brassica family comprising varieties of rapeseed and canola as they contain nutritionally valuable proteins, which have potential to be used in food, but are now rarely or not used as food components. The purpose of the present work is to provide a comprehensive review of main canola/rapeseed proteins: cruciferin and napin, with the focus on their nutritional and functional features, putting special emphasis on their possible applications in food. Technological challenges to obtain rapeseed protein products that are free from anti-nutritional factors are also addressed. As molecular structure of cruciferin and napin differs, they exhibit distinct features, such as solubility, emulsifying, foaming or gelling properties. Potential allergenic effect of 2S napin has to be taken under consideration. Overall, rapeseed proteins demonstrate beneficial nutritional value and functional properties and are deemed to play important roles both in food, as well as, non-food and non-feed applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available