4.7 Article

Experimentally validated peridynamic fracture modelling of mortar at the meso-scale

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 267, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120939

Keywords

Mortar; Peridynamics; Fracture behaviour; Mechanical properties

Funding

  1. National Natural science foundation of China [51678317, 51978352, 51478252, 51978387]
  2. Natural science foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2017JL024, ZR2013EEM025]
  3. Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation for Young Teachers in the Higher Education Institutions of China [161069]
  4. Key Technology Research and Development Program of Shandong [2015GSF122009]
  5. Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province [tsqn201909032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study implemented the Peridynamics theory on the fracture performance modelling of mortar at the meso-scale, showing that the PD theory can predict the load-displacement response and crack pattern satisfactorily without further calibration.
Peridynamics (PD) model is a nonlocal theory to describe the formation of discontinuities, e.g., cracks and fractures due to deformations in the displacement field. The current study aims at implementing the Peridynamics theory on the fracture performance modelling of mortar at the meso-scale. For this purpose, a computational uniaxial tension test was performed on a multi-phase virtual specimen consisting of sand, hydrated cement paste and air voids. The mechanical properties of each phase were derived from the recent outcome of micromechanical models. The modelling results (stress-strain response and fracture pattern) were compared with the experimental observations in the literature. The comparison shows that, without further calibration, the PD theory can predict the load-displacement response and crack pattern satisfactorily. The model was further used to explain the load-displacement response and fracture process. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available