Journal
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 933-943Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13638
Keywords
Aichi Biodiversity Target 11; coastal management; habitat loss; human modification map; spatial bias
Funding
- Queensland Wader Study Group Nigel Roberts Student Research Fund
- Australian Research Council [LP150101059]
- Queensland Department of Environment and Science Wetlands Team
- Australian Research Council DECRA fellowship [DE190100101]
- Australian Research Council [DE190100101, LP150101059] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Tidal flats are globally important coastal ecosystems for biodiversity and ecosystem services, but are facing rapid losses due to human impacts. Protection of tidal flats in protected areas has made progress globally, but significant shortfalls exist, particularly in Asia. High human pressure on tidal flats highlights the need for deeper understanding of driving factors and effective policies for holistic coastal and catchment management strategies.
Tidal flats are a globally distributed coastal ecosystem important for supporting biodiversity and ecosystem services. Local to continental-scale studies have documented rapid loss of tidal habitat driven by human impacts, but assessments of progress in their conservation are lacking. With an internally consistent estimate of distribution and change, based on Landsat satellite imagery, now available for the world's tidal flats, we examined tidal flat representation in protected areas (PAs) and human pressure on tidal flats. We determined tidal flat representation and its net change in PAs by spatially overlaying tidal flat maps with the World Database of Protected Areas. Similarly, we overlaid the most recent distribution map of tidal flats (2014-2016) with the human modification map (HMc) (range from 0, no human pressure, to 1, very high human pressure) to estimate the human pressure exerted on this ecosystem. Sixty-eight percent of the current extent of tidal flats is subject to moderate to very high human pressure (HMc > 0.1), but 31% of tidal flat extent occurred in PAs, far exceeding PA coverage of the marine (6%) and terrestrial (13%) realms. Net change of tidal flat extent inside PAs was similar to tidal flat net change outside PAs from 1999 to 2016. Substantial shortfalls in protection of tidal flats occurred across Asia, where large intertidal extents coincided with high to very high human pressure (HMc > 0.4-1.0) and net tidal flat losses up to 86.4 km(2) (95% CI 83.9-89.0) occurred inside individual PAs in the study period. Taken together, our results show substantial progress in PA designation for tidal flats globally, but that PA status alone does not prevent all habitat loss. Safeguarding the world's tidal flats will thus require deeper understanding of the factors that govern their dynamics and effective policy that promotes holistic coastal and catchment management strategies.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available