4.7 Review

Addressing circular economy through design for X approaches: A systematic literature review

Journal

COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY
Volume 120, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2020.103245

Keywords

Circular design; Design for X; Circular economy; End-of-Life; Sustainability; Product Service System; Design guidelines; Knowledge management; Product design approach; Environmental product design; Design for sustainability; Design for environment; Remanufacturing; Recycling; Recover; Reuse; Reliability; Circular design decision-support; Circular design metrics and evaluation; Systematic literature review

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [760792]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Guided by a technological revolution, widely discussed paradigms as servitization and Circular Economy( CE) are progressively pushing manufacturers towards delivering increasingly complex solutions. Design plays a strategic role in this sense, either considering products, services or Product-Service Systems (PSSs). Concurrent engineering and, specifically, Design for X (DfX) approaches have been widely associated to products, revealing great potentialities for enhancing service functionalities like supportability and circularity. Again, DfX approaches have been already exploited to systematically support the PSS design process, given their re-known ability to allow a better information sharing between product designers and service managers. However, even if several DfX approaches related with the End of Life (EoL) stage already exist (e.g. Design for recycling, remanufacturing and EoL), they still need to better fit with a circular design perspective. Therefore, the aim of this paper is exploring and understanding how design can contribute towards a CE transition through the adoption of DfX approaches. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available