4.7 Article

Understanding the effect of interfacial engineering on interfacial thermal resistance in nacre-like cellulose nanofiber/graphene film

Journal

COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 197, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108229

Keywords

polymer-matrix composites (PMCs); Layered strcutures; Thermal properties; Interface

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51903223, U1604253]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M642781]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the influence of interface on interfacial thermal resistance (R-b) is important in preparing polymer-based thermal conductive composites. In this work, we demonstrated the competitive relation of the interfacial hydrogen bonding interaction and the thermal insulating effect produced by polydopamine (PDA) modification on R-b in nacre-like cellulose nanofiber/graphene nanosheet (CNF/GNS) film. By increasing PDA grafting amount on GNS, both the interfacial hydrogen bonding interaction, positive role in reducing R-b, and the thermal insulating effect, negative role in reducing R-b, were reinforced simultaneously. For the CNF/GNS film with low filler loading (10 wt%), appropriate PDA grafting amount can maximize its hydrogen bonding effect and simultaneously minimize its thermal insulation effect, thus reducing R-b to 8.61 x 10(-9) m(2) K/W from 1.11 x 10(-8) m(2) K/W and improving thermal conductivity to 13.47 W/mK from 10.91 W/mK comparing to unmodified film. However, for the films with high GNS loading (50 wt%), PDA modification failed to improve the thermal conductivity since the dominant face-to-face direct contact between overlapping GNS (contact thermal resistance) was separated by PDA layer. The new understanding on R-b affected by interfacial modification would act as guiding function in preparing high thermal conductive nacre-like layered structural films.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available