4.7 Article

Polyurethane composite foams including silicone-acrylic particles for enhanced sound absorption via increased damping and frictions of sound waves

Journal

COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 198, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108325

Keywords

Polyurethane foam; Sound absorption; Filler; Morphology

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2018R1D1A1A09082239]
  2. X-mind Corps program of National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [NRF-2017H1D8A1030582]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [4299990414506] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polyurethane (PU) foams are widely used in automotive applications for sound absorption products because of their easiness of manufacturing process and light weight characteristics. In this study, PU composite foams including silicone-acrylic filler particles were fabricated to examine the sound absorption properties. The filler particles acted as nucleation sites and led to the decreased cavity sizes until 2 wt% inclusions, but after this point the cavity sizes increased due to the particle agglomeration. The filler particle contents strongly influenced on the open and partial-open pore ratios and the sound absorption characteristics of the PU composite foams. The best sound absorption performance was achieved at 2 wt% silicone-acrylic filler particles with the smallest cavity size and the highest partial-open pore ratio. Therefore, applying appropriate types and contents of filler particles is critical to accomplish improved sound absorption properties in PU composite foams by developing well-defined cell morphology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available