4.5 Article

Folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A multi-arm randomized controlled clinical trial

Journal

COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE
Volume 53, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102526

Keywords

Folic acid; Vitamin B 12; Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Funding

  1. Institute Research Grant of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India [T-IM-F/Biochem/15/22]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study was conducted to investigate and compare the effects of add-on folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation on glycaemic control, insulin resistance and serum lipid profile in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Study design & Intervention: This study was a randomized, multi-arm, open-label clinical trial. 80 patients with type 2 diabetes and on stable oral antidiabetics were enrolled and 20 patients each were randomly allocated to one of the four groups - Group A: add-on Folic acid (5 mg/day); Group B: add-on Methylcobalamin (500 mcg/day); Group C: add-on Folic acid (5 mg/day) + Methylcobalamin (500 mcg/day) and Group D: Standard oral anti-diabetic drugs. The patients were followed up after 8 weeks. Results: HbA1c improved significantly in Groups B and C [median changes from baseline - 1.2 % (- 13 mmol/mol) and - 1.5 % (- 16 mmol/mol) respectively, p values 0.04 and 0.02 respectively] compared to Group D. Groups B and C also showed significant improvements in plasma insulin, insulin resistance and serum adiponectin compared to Group D. Serum homocysteine declined significantly in all three groups with add-on supplementation compared to standard treatment. No improvement in the lipid profile was noted in any of the groups. Conclusions: Add-on supplementation with vitamin B12 improved glycaemic control and insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available