4.6 Article

Invariance Principle for the Random Lorentz Gas-Beyond the Boltzmann-Grad Limit

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS
Volume 379, Issue 2, Pages 589-632

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-020-03852-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/N509619/1 1793795]
  2. EPSRC (UK) [EP/P003656/1]
  3. NKFI (HU) [K-129170]
  4. EPSRC [EP/P003656/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We prove the invariance principle for a random Lorentz-gas particle in 3 dimensions under the Boltzmann-Grad limit and simultaneous diffusive scaling. That is, for the trajectory of a point-like particle moving among infinite-mass, hard-core, spherical scatterers of radius r, placed according to a Poisson point process of density rho, in the limit rho -> infinity, r -> 0, rho r(2) -> 1 up to time scales of order T = o(r(-2) |log r |(-2)). To our knowledge this represents the first significant progress towards solving rigorously this problem in classical nonequilibrium statistical physics, since the groundbreaking work of Gallavotti (Phys Rev 185:308-322, 1969, Nota Interna Univ di Roma 358, 1970, Statistical mechanics. A short treatise. Theoretical and mathematical physics series, Springer, Berlin, 1999), Spohn (Commun Math Phys 60:277-290, 1978, Rev Mod Phys 52:569-611, 1980) and Boldrighini-Bunimovich-Sinai (J Stat Phys 32:477501, 1983). The novelty is that the diffusive scaling of particle trajectory and the kinetic (Boltzmann-Grad) limit are taken simultaneously. The main ingredients are a coupling of the mechanical trajectory with the Markovian random flight process, and probabilistic and geometric controls on the efficiency of this coupling. Similar results have been earlier obtained for the weak coupling limit of classical and quantum random Lorentz gas, by Komorowski-Ryzhik (Commun Math Phys 263:277-323, 2006), respectively, Erd os-Salmhofer-Yau (ActaMath 200:211-277, 2008, CommunMath Phys 271:1-53, 2007). However, the following are substantial differences between our work and these ones: (1) The physical setting is different: lowdensity rather than weak coupling. (2) The method of approach is different: probabilistic coupling rather than analytic/perturbative. (3) Due to (2), the time scale of validity of our diffusive approximation-expressed in terms of the kinetic time scale-is much longer and fully explicit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available